What MP do you want?
Botox island is a unique society fed with doctrines in the guise of academic pursuits. So much so that its people have lost the ability to think anymore. Case in point.
People have confused political parties with the MPs in parliament. Majority of them thinks that the ruling party brand is synonymous with quality, honesty and integrity! So much so that as long as the voting ballot paper puts the party brand there, irregardless if the candidate is a douchebag, people just tick.
To bring to clarity if the people are right, we must first define what makes a good MP. To make it even easier to grasp, lets define what makes a good parent to a child. Statistically, high achievers parents have been shown to neglect their children busy making money in the workplace. Their parental duty is delegated to the house maid. And spoiled rich kids is a by-product of this arrangement. So what makes a go-getter parent profile?

In botox island, the academic pursuits have been to aim to achieve being a doctor, lawyer, professional. And the ruling party has played on this to introduce all their MPs with this calibre as a hallmark of "quality". But wait, we all know that go-getters parents dont listen to their children very well, and tends to delegate parenting duty to the housemaid! Now look at the barrage of people at meet-the-people session, the MP only sits in once a month, his assistants (maids) would take questions, filter requests and attend to them on the MP's behalf. Meanwhile the doctor, laywer, professional MP has more money making matters to attend to in his daily life! Go-getter parent?
So what makes a good parent, we have heard stories of poor/caring children brought up and succeed in life, because their parents play a major influence on their lives. With no maid in-between, the role model of the child has to be the parent, if not, bad influence from school. But this bad influence can be negated if the parent remain focus on the child during his time at home. For family is first base for all growing children. "有家有国".
Yes, the MP must have world experience (to be a parent to a child), must have minimum success in life (as a role model). Definitely a bum cant qualify no matter how kind hearted he can be!!! But not overly ambitious, for that would most likely deviate from his prime directive. Doctors, lawyers, professionals are go-getters, they are very good at what they do, merticulous in their profession. But lacking in humanity, for they may not know how. Too afraid to expose themselves, too insecure, hiding behind their badge of only honour, the JOB! Thats nothing much they can offer.

An MP represents the people that voted for him/her, not the party that he/she joins. A parent fights for his/her children, not put them aside while he makes money. So the people/children must know how to demand rightfully from their MP/parent, not money, not benefits, but for a concrete fundamental society that protects their well being.
People have confused political parties with the MPs in parliament. Majority of them thinks that the ruling party brand is synonymous with quality, honesty and integrity! So much so that as long as the voting ballot paper puts the party brand there, irregardless if the candidate is a douchebag, people just tick.
To bring to clarity if the people are right, we must first define what makes a good MP. To make it even easier to grasp, lets define what makes a good parent to a child. Statistically, high achievers parents have been shown to neglect their children busy making money in the workplace. Their parental duty is delegated to the house maid. And spoiled rich kids is a by-product of this arrangement. So what makes a go-getter parent profile?

In botox island, the academic pursuits have been to aim to achieve being a doctor, lawyer, professional. And the ruling party has played on this to introduce all their MPs with this calibre as a hallmark of "quality". But wait, we all know that go-getters parents dont listen to their children very well, and tends to delegate parenting duty to the housemaid! Now look at the barrage of people at meet-the-people session, the MP only sits in once a month, his assistants (maids) would take questions, filter requests and attend to them on the MP's behalf. Meanwhile the doctor, laywer, professional MP has more money making matters to attend to in his daily life! Go-getter parent?
So what makes a good parent, we have heard stories of poor/caring children brought up and succeed in life, because their parents play a major influence on their lives. With no maid in-between, the role model of the child has to be the parent, if not, bad influence from school. But this bad influence can be negated if the parent remain focus on the child during his time at home. For family is first base for all growing children. "有家有国".
Yes, the MP must have world experience (to be a parent to a child), must have minimum success in life (as a role model). Definitely a bum cant qualify no matter how kind hearted he can be!!! But not overly ambitious, for that would most likely deviate from his prime directive. Doctors, lawyers, professionals are go-getters, they are very good at what they do, merticulous in their profession. But lacking in humanity, for they may not know how. Too afraid to expose themselves, too insecure, hiding behind their badge of only honour, the JOB! Thats nothing much they can offer.

An MP represents the people that voted for him/her, not the party that he/she joins. A parent fights for his/her children, not put them aside while he makes money. So the people/children must know how to demand rightfully from their MP/parent, not money, not benefits, but for a concrete fundamental society that protects their well being.